Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you have actually securely connected to the.gov site. Share sensitive info only on official, safe and secure websites.
- About - The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Offense
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney General ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct providers of housing, such as landlords and realty companies along with other entities, such as towns, banks or other loaning institutions and property owners insurer whose discriminatory practices make housing not available to individuals because of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
impairment.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department may submit match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of persons raises an issue of general public importance. Where force or threat of force is utilized to reject or hinder fair housing rights, the Department of Justice may institute criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers treatments for handling specific problems of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have actually been victims of a prohibited housing practice, might file a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings fits on behalf of people based upon referrals from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers attempt to camouflage their discrimination by offering false details about accessibility of housing, either saying that absolutely nothing was offered or guiding homeseekers to certain areas based on race. Individuals who receive such incorrect details or misdirection may have no knowledge that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought many cases declaring this sort of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to discover this sort of hidden discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. The majority of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have declared discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have likewise alleged that municipalities and other city government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they denied licenses or zoning modifications for housing developments, or relegated them to mainly minority areas, because the potential locals were anticipated to be predominantly African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon religious beliefs. This prohibition covers circumstances of obvious discrimination against members of a particular religion also less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances designed to limit making use of personal homes as a locations of praise. The number of cases filed since 1968 alleging religious discrimination is little in contrast to some of the other prohibited bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does contain a restricted exception that enables non-commercial housing run by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to persons of the very same faith.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Recently, the Department's focus in this area has actually been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with limited housing choices, typically have little option however to tolerate the embarrassment and degradation of sexual harassment or danger having their families and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is aimed at landlords who develop an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from occupants or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to acquire relief for occupants who have been treated unfairly by a property manager because of sex and also hinder other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing consequences. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage lending might also adversely impact women, particularly minority women. This kind of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of an individual's birth or where his or her ancestors come from. Census data suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing sector of our nation's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus municipal federal governments that have tried to lower or restrict the number of Hispanic households that may live in their neighborhoods. We have sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more rigid underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has likewise taken legal action against lenders for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have actually acted against personal landlords who have actually victimized such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing versus families with children under 18. In addition to prohibiting an outright rejection of housing to households with kids, the Act likewise avoids housing companies from enforcing any unique requirements or conditions on occupants with custody of children. For instance, landlords might not find families with kids in any single part of a complex, position an unreasonable limitation on the overall variety of individuals who may reside in a house, or limit their access to leisure services offered to other tenants. In most instances, the modified Fair Housing Act restricts a housing company from declining to lease or offer to households with children. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which fulfills the standards set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published guidelines and additional guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of special needs in all kinds of housing deals. The Act specifies individuals with an impairment to suggest those people with mental or physical problems that considerably limit several significant life activities. The term psychological or physical problems may consist of conditions such as blindness, hearing disability, movement problems, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, chronic tiredness, learning impairment, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity might consist of seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks, taking care of one's self, learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise protects persons who have a record of such a problems, or are considered having such a disability. Current users of prohibited illegal drugs, individuals founded guilty for unlawful manufacture or circulation of a regulated compound, sex offenders, and juvenile transgressors are ruled out disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no securities to people with or without disabilities who provide a direct hazard to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone presents such a direct threat must be made on a customized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on general assumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for individuals with disabilities has actually concentrated on two major areas. One is insuring that zoning and other regulations worrying land usage are not used to impede the residential choices of these people, consisting of needlessly limiting communal, or gather together, property plans, such as group homes. The second location is guaranteeing that recently built multifamily housing is built in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is accessible to and usable by people with disabilities, and, in particular, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination versus individuals with disabilities, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with disabilities may cohabit in congregate living arrangements, frequently referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act restricts municipalities and other city government entities from making zoning or land use decisions or executing land use policies that exclude or otherwise victimize individuals with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To make use of land usage policies or actions that deal with groups of individuals with specials needs less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be a regulation restricting housing for individuals with impairments or a specific kind of impairment, such as mental disease, from finding in a specific area, while allowing other groups of unrelated individuals to cohabit because area.
- To do something about it versus, or deny a license, for a home due to the fact that of the special needs of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a structure license for a home because it was meant to supply housing for individuals with psychological retardation.
- To decline to clear up lodgings in land use and zoning policies and procedures where such lodgings might be essential to manage persons or groups of individuals with specials needs an equivalent chance to use and enjoy housing. What makes up a reasonable accommodation is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for modifications of guidelines or policies are reasonable. If a requested modification enforces an unnecessary financial or administrative burden on a city government, or if an adjustment produces a basic modification in a city government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing versus individuals with impairments to include a failure "to develop and construct" specific brand-new multi-family homes so that they are available to and functional by persons with disabilities, and particularly people who use wheelchairs. The Act needs all freshly built multi-family dwellings of 4 or more units planned for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain features: an accessible entryway on an available route, accessible common and public use areas, doors sufficiently broad to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible paths into and through each house, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, supports in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional cooking areas and bathrooms set up so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.
Developers, home builders, owners, and designers accountable for the style or construction of new multi-family housing might be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to satisfy these design requirements. The Department of Justice has brought lots of enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. Most of the cases have actually been dealt with by approval decrees offering a variety of kinds of relief, including: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where practical and where it is not-- options (monetary funds or other building requirements) that will provide for making other housing systems accessible; training on the ease of access requirements for those included in the building process; a required that all new housing projects abide by the ease of access requirements, and monetary relief for those hurt by the infractions. In addition, the Department has looked for to promote accessibility through building codes.
